Movie reruns

Are there movies you can watch over and over again without you getting tired? Or movies no one else seems to like but you absolutely love it? If so here is the place for those.

I absolutely adore the movie King Arthur from 2004. The critics don't like it, I don't know anyone who likes it but I don't get tired of it. Watched it first on paytv at night during the World Cup 2006 and it seems I became addicted to it then. The beginning and the end where Lancelot tells the story is my favorit part. And I like the actors especially Mads Mikkelsen and Ioan Gruffudd, but not so much Clive Owen and Keira Knightly. But the Merlin guy is quite nice. Yes, I am probably the only person in here who likes that movie but I'm not ashamed

I can watch any Rush Hour movie or Groundhog Day over and over again. My guilty pleasures are dumb action movies like the Transporter series.

Oh god, i should make a list.... Independence Day, Groundhog Day, The New Guy, Curse of the Black Pearl, Three Musketeers (disney, with Charlie Sheen). Rush Hour and lots of russian/ussr movies i grew up with that you guys would not recognize)))

-_CreepeR_- wrote:Oh god, i should make a list.... Independence Day, Groundhog Day, The New Guy, Curse of the Black Pearl, Three Musketeers (disney, with Charlie Sheen). Rush Hour and lots of russian/ussr movies i grew up with that you guys would not recognize)))

Curse of the Black Pearl is so good I forgive the second. Not quite the third...

the second and third would be soooooo much better if the goddamn bloom and knightley weren't in them >< As proven by 4th, which was better than 2nd 3rd combined. (although still not even fish food compared to teh genius of teh 1st. )

Oh god. The fourth was worse than any single one. It was so bad.

It reaaaaaaaaaaaally wasn't. It lacked scale of teh previous ones, and seemed bland because of it, but it's nowhere nearly as bad as the second one or even the third one.

-_CreepeR_- wrote:It reaaaaaaaaaaaally wasn't. It lacked scale of teh previous ones, and seemed bland because of it, but it's nowhere nearly as bad as the second one or even the third one.

I was bored throughout the fourth one. Just bored and not invested in any of the characters including Jack Sparrow. It was a bad movie. The second one is defendable on its own, but even the third has its moments (in between unnecessary clusterfuck)

I fell asleep in th theater watching the 4th movie. But the 1st is defintily a movie to watch time and again

....you fuckers wouldn't recognize quality cinema if it stabbed you in the eye >_> 4th was awesome >_>

I didn't fall asleep because the movie was bad, I was just so damn tired from work
I liked the 4th, was more on a Barbossafocus, I think. Liked that

-_CreepeR_- wrote:....you fuckers wouldn't recognize quality cinema if it stabbed you in the eye >_> 4th was awesome >_>

Dude I hate to break it to you. It sucked.

wolfdarkn wrote:

-_CreepeR_- wrote:....you fuckers wouldn't recognize quality cinema if it stabbed you in the eye >_> 4th was awesome >_>

Dude I hate to break it to you. It sucked.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion, and my opinion is that your opinion can go fuck itself xD

And I can't respect your opinion of thinking the 4th was better than individually the 2nd and 3rd, let alone combined.

That's because you underestimate my hate towards Bloom and Knightley.

I hated those characters too by the end of 2nd and 3rd, but not so much to think that On Stranger Tides could have been any better.


ALMOST GROUNDHOG DAY

Got my bluray copy ready.

Another movie I can rewatch on and are the first 3 Indiana movies. Aliens and Indi don't fit together

Can we be honest and say that Temple of Doom is also not very good. Because it isn't. Odd numbered Indiana Jones movies are the best.

I actually like the second one Good, the lady is awefully whiny but I love and I really mean it, I really love Short Round He's the reason I watch the movie XD

Temple of Doom was hilariously bad xD And i don't know why everyone hates on Crystal Skull Aside from teh refrigerator scene and some obvious inconsistencies with the magnetic fields it was a cool movie 0_o Well minus he-who-shall-not-be-named of course. And Aliens fit quite nicely into the mood of the series.

Aliens don't fit Indi at all, in my opinion

The guy has fity kinds of gods being stated as real at the same fucking time, let's just say that nothing is too ridiculous for these series.

Aliens were put into the movie for a good reason actually. The first three took place in the 30s and were supposed to be like the pulpy action movies of the 30s. Since the 4th took place in the 50s, they wanted to pay tribute to B Alien movies of the 50s.

wolfdarkn wrote:Aliens were put into the movie for a good reason actually. The first three took place in the 30s and were supposed to be like the pulpy action movies of the 30s. Since the 4th took place in the 50s, they wanted to pay tribute to B Alien movies of the 50s.

You might be reading too much in t it, it's Lucas after all.

-_CreepeR_- wrote:

wolfdarkn wrote:Aliens were put into the movie for a good reason actually. The first three took place in the 30s and were supposed to be like the pulpy action movies of the 30s. Since the 4th took place in the 50s, they wanted to pay tribute to B Alien movies of the 50s.

You might be reading too much in t it, it's Lucas after all.

I'm not because it was said by him and Spielberg. That was literally Lucas' vision.